American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 3, June 2015, Pages: 36-40

Aerobic Bacteria Isolates of Septic Wound Infections and Their Antibiogram in North Central Nigeria

James Garba Damen1, *, Salami Faruk1, Comfort Dancha2

1Department of Medical laboratory Science College of Medical Science, University of Jos, Nigeria

2Medical Laboratory Services Department, Federal Polytechnic Mubi, Adamawa state, Nigeria

Email address:

(J. G. Damen)
(J. G. Damen)

To cite this article:

James Garba Damen, Salami Faruk, Comfort Dancha. Aerobic Bacteria Isolates of Septic Wound Infections and Their Antibiogram in North Central Nigeria. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 36-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20150303.12


Abstract: Background: Wound infections are major problem in our health care facilities. They are the most common hospital acquired infections resulting into extended length of stay in the hospital with high cost and frequently encounter in surgical patients. Objectives: The study was designed to determine aerobic bacterial pathogens responsible for wound infections and their antibiotic sensitivity profile among patients of Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH).Methods: Wound swabs were aseptically collected randomly from septic wounds of 345 patients in different sections of the hospital; they were cultured on Blood Agar (BA), McConkey Agar (MCA) and chocolate Aga (CA) and incubated aerobically over night, direct Gram stain were carried out on the wound swabs. The isolates were also examined by Gram stain and each of them were identified using standard biochemical methods. The antibiotic susceptibility of each pathogen was carried out using the disc diffusion method on Muller Hinton Agar. Results: A total of 345 wound swabs were collected and examined, 243 (70.4%) aerobic bacteria were isolated. The out patients had the highest prevalent of 85.3% positive while the least prevalent of 50.0% was recorded from female medical patients. The males had the highest prevalent of 82.1% while 55.0% of medical females were positive for bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus was the highest bacteria reported while the least prevalent of bacteria was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.7%). Ofloxacin was highly sensitive for all the bacteria isolated while Amoxicillins, penicilins and cotrimoxazole recorded reduced sensitivity to the isolates. Conclusion: Aerobic bacteria are highly predominant in septic wound and most of the bacteria are resistant to commonly used antibiotics which might be due to inadequate wound management, poor antibiotics selection in most parts of the hospital; and indiscriminate use of antibiotics.

Keyword: Wound Aerobic, Bacteria, Infection


1. Introduction

Wound infection is important in the morbidity and mortality of patients irrespective of its cause; can delay healing and is associated with longer hospital stay thereby increasing cost of healthcare1. Wound infection is said to be the most common nosocomial infection2.  Most wound infections can be classified into two major categories: skin and soft tissue infections, although they often overlap as a consequence of disease progression 3,4,5,6 Routine surveillance for hospital-acquired wound infections is recommended by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention7 and the Surgical Infection Society 8.In the developed world, studies on wound infections are focused on surgical sites infections because other types of wound infections are not problematic9,10,1 but in developing countries, other types of wound infections are very important causes of morbidity and mortality 11,12,1. The prevalence rate of different bacterial in infected wounds varies13  it exists inter-institutionally and intra-institutionally14,15,16. Diagnoses of wound infections can be a serious problem in resource-poor settings, due to inadequate diagnostic equipments or qualified profesionals17, resulting to the absence of important epidemiological  data on wound infections and no established evidence-based guidelines to aid empiric treatment18. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the use of topical antiseptics for the treatment of wound infections has persisted and brought about the reemergence of alternative therapies and the search for new anti-microbial agents 19. This  study was designed to establish the current aerobic bacterial and their drug sensitivity in wound infections of patients at the  Jos University Teaching Hospital, with a view to generate relevant data that will be of great benefit to the hospital’s policies on selection of antibiotics for the management of wound infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted among both in and out patients with septic wounds attending Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Plateau State, North Central Nigeria

2.2. Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance was sought and obtained from JUTH ethical committee before commencement of the study.

2.3. Informed Consent

The study was explained to each of the participants in simple Hausa or English and their informed consent were obtained before enrolment into the study. Structured questionnaires which content information on age, sex, department, type of wound infection, sources of wound infection and presence/absence of discharges and history of antibiotics treatment were administered to each of the consented participant.

2.4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Patients with wounds that show signs of infection were eligible for the study while those with wound that were not septic and almost healing up were excluded from the study..

2.5. Sample Collection

Sterile swab sticks were used to collect 345 wound swabs under aseptic procedures and were send to the Microbiology for cultivation.

2.6. Culture Media

Culture media used in this study were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions, they include; Blood Agar (BA), MacConkey Agar (MCA), Chocolate Agar (CA) and Muller Hinton agar20

2.7. Cultivation

The wound swabs were immediately cultured onto Blood agar, chocolate agar and McConkey agar, the specimen were streaked out carefully for discrete colonies and were incubated at 37oc while a candle extension jar was used for the Chacolate for 24hrs. The cultured plates were examined for bacteria using standard methods such as macroscopy, microscopy, biochemical reaction tests.

2.8. Biochemical Analysis

Based on cultural characters and Grams reactions, colonies were subjected to motility test using the hanging drop technique; catalase, coagulase, indole, urease Triple sugar iron agar tests and citrate utilization test were done for identification of the isolates to species levels according to21

2.9. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests

Identified isolates were tested by disc diffusion methods using antibiotics such as; Amoxycillin (30µg), Ampicillin (10 µg), Penicillin G (30µg), cotrimoxazole (25µg), Erthromycin (5µg) Tetracycline (10µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg) and ofloxaxin (30µg). The test and interpretation were carried out according to standard methods22,23

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The chi square test was used to determine the possible association between the variables in the data obtained.

3. Results

A total of 345 wound swabs were collected and examined in medical microbiology laboratory in which 243 (70.4%) aerobic bacteria were isolated. In the General outpatient Department 102 specimen were examined, 87(85.3%) were positive for aerobic bacteria followed by 81 specimen examined from male surgical and 57(70.4%) were positive, the least was from make medical were 30 specimen were examined and 15(50.0%) were positive.  A total of 196 specimen were from males and 161(82.1%) were positive for bacteria while of the 149 specimen from females examined, 82(55.0%) were positive for bacteria. Aerobic bacteria isolated from this study were Staphylococcus aureus (45.2%), Klebsiella species (19.4%), Escherichia coli (12.9%), Proteus species (12.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.7%). Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species, Proteus species, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosawere highly sensitive to ofloxacin but there was reduced susceptibility of the isolates to commonly used antibiotics such as amoxicillin, tetracycline and cotrimoxazole.

Table 1. Prevalence of pathogen in relation to sources of sample

Source No. Examined No. Positive (%) Chi-square P-Value
GOPD 102 87(85.3) 24.485 0.001
Male surgical ward 81 57(70.4)    
Female surgical ward 51 30(58.8)    
Paediatric surgical ward 39 30(76.9)    
Male medical ward 42 24(57.1)    
Female medical ward 30 15(50.0)    
Total 345 243(70.4)    

Table 2. Sex distribution of bacteria isolates from septic wound in Jos

Gender No. Examined No. Positive (%) Chi-square P Value
Male 196 161(82.1) 29.874 0.001
Female 149 82(55.0)    
Total 345 243(70.4)    

Figure 1. Distribution of aerobic bacteria in septic wound in Jos.

Table 3. Antibiogram of the Isolates in septic wound in Jos.

Antibiotics S. aureusN=126 NS (%) Klebsiella speciesN=54 NS (%) Proteus speciesN=36 NS (%) E. coliN=36 NS (%) PseudomonasaeruginosaN=27 NS (%)
AMC 39(31.0) 38(70.4) 31(86.1) 33(91.7) 0(0.0)
AMX 9(7.1) 7(13.0) 27(75.0) 25(69.4) 0(0.0)
E 75(59.5) NT NT NT NT
PN 21(16.7) NT NT NT NT
COT 33(26.2) 8(14.8) 21(58.3) 19(52.8) 0(0.0)
CN 54(42.9) 28(51.9) 27(75.0) 30(83.3) 0(0.0)
CIP 84(68.8) 47(80.0) 33(91.7) 32(88.9) 0(0.0)
CHL 86(68.3) 31(57.4) 23(42.6) 25(69.4) 0(0.0)
OFX 96(76.2) 47(87.0) 34(94.4) 34(94.4) 21(77.8)

KEY: NS= Number test, NT= Not tested, AMC=Amoxicillin and clavulanate, AMX =Amoxicilline, E = Erythromycin, PN = Penicillin, COT = Cotrmoxazole, CN = Gentamycin, CPX =Ciprofloxacilline, CHL = Chloramphenicol, OFX = Ofloxacin

4. Discussion

The outpatient Department reported the highest prevalent of 85.3% this prevalence of bacteria in septic wounds is associated with inadequate wound management mostly on the part of the patients. Majority of them will start to manage their wound traditionally and locally at home and only come to the hospital when local management fails. This was followed by male surgical who had 70.4% of bacterial infection this might be associated with nosocomial infection which are usually prominent in surgical wards because of surgical intervention and operative procedures. There was a significant different between the aerobic bacteria isolated from different sections of the hospital (P<0.05). Our finding is in consonant with previous report1, 2

In this study males had the highest prevalence of 82.1% compared with the females who had 55.0% P<0.05. This findingcorresponds with documented records24, 25, 26, 27, 28This finding might be associated to the fact that in our culture males are mostly involves in activities such as farming, carpentry, mechanics, transportation which exposes them to trauma than the females.

This studied showed that isolates reported in this study were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species , Escherichia coli, Proteus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa  this findings corresponds with other people work1, 15

Staphylococcus aureus  was the most frequent pathogen 45.2% followed by Klebsiella species 19.4%, our results showed thatStaphylococcus aureuswas the most predominant pathogen which agrees with quite a number of previous report 24, 29, 30,31,32. The high level of Staphylococcus aureus might be associated with the fact that it is an endogenous source of infection and can also be contaminated from the environment. Wound which is the disruption of natural skin barriers,S. aureusis a common bacterium on surfaces and can easily find their way into the abrasion on human skin to cause infection.

This study showed that the most frequent Gram negative bacteria is Klebsiella species (19.4%) which contradict earlier report 2 which stated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent. Mohamandama 24reported thatEscherichia coliwas the most common. Our study showed the changing trends of organisms isolated from septic wounds in the study area. It is therefore pertinent to always carried out similar research to determine current pattern of organism in our environment. This will greatly help in giving empirical treatment to emergency cases.

This study showed that Staphylococcus aureus gave high sensitivity to ofloxacin (76.2%), while Ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol had 68% this results is similar documented report33 However S. aureusrevealed lower sensitivity to most commonly used antibiotic such as penicillin(16.7%) cotrimoxazole (26.2%) and Amoxicillin (31.0%) these finding are similar to previous studies33 this might be associated with the fact that most S. aureus in the study area produces β lactamase enzymes. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major problem in the study area as it was only sensitive to ofloxacin (77.8%) all the other Antibiotic tested were resistant, our finding corresponds with the report of 34 This resistant rate might be associated with the irrational and inappropriate use of Antibiotic.Escherichia coli was sensitive to all antibiotic use in this study. Klebsiella species showed good sensitivity to ofloxacin( 87.0%), Ciprofloxacin( 80.0%) and Amoxicillin (70.4%)  but also showed reduced sensitivity to Amoxicillin (13,0%) Cotrimoxazole (14.8%) this result is also similar to reported studies34

We have demonstrated a current shift in the prevalence of bacteria in septic wound in the study area and also the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates to guide clinicians to give empirical treatment in emergency situation and very important in formulation of drug policy.

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the funds from Faith Medical Diagnostic center for this study. We are indeed very grateful to all the patients who willingly give consent to be part of the study. We thank all the Doctors and the nurses in the dressing room and the various surgical and medical wards who gave us maximum cooperation during this study.


References

  1. Lateef O.A. Thanni ; Olubunmi A. Osinupebi,; and Mope Deji-Agboola, (2003) Prevalence of  bacterial pathogens in infected wounds in a tertiary hospital,  Journal of the National Medical Association 95(12)1189-1192
  2. Rama Sikka, JK Mann, Deep, MG Vashist, Uma Chaudhary, Antriksh Deep (2012)Prevalence and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Nosocomial Infections in a Surgical Ward Indian Journal of Clinical Practice, 22(10),519-525
  3. Hackner, S. M. (1994) Common infection of the skin: characteristics, causes,and cures. Postgrad. Med. 96:43–52.
  4. Janda, J. M., S. L. Abbott, and R. A. Brenden (1997) Overview of the etiologyof wound infections with particular emphasis on community-acquired illnesses.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.16:189–201.
  5. Kahn, R. M., and E. J. C. Goldstein (1993) Common bacterial skin infections:diagnostic clues and therapeutic options. Postgrad. Med. 93:175–182
  6. Onderdonk, A. B. (1998) Pharmacodynamics and microbiology of tovrafloxacin in animal models of surgical infection. Am. J. Surg. 176:39S–45S.
  7. Condon, R. E., R. W. Haley, J. T. Lee, and J. L. Meakins (1988) Does theinfection control control infection? Arch. Surg. 123:250–256.
  8. Haley, R. W., D. H. Culver, J. W. White, W. M. Morgan, T. G. Emori, V. P.Munn, and T. M. Hooton (1985) The efficacy of infection surveillance andcontrol programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am. J.Epidemiol.121:182–205.
  9. Garner JS. (1995) CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985, supersedes, Guide lines for prevention of surgical wound infections Infection control 7(3): 193-2000.
  10. Gaynes R, Culver D, Harran T, Edwards J, Richards C, Tolson J.(2001) Surgical site infection Rates in the United States, 1992-1998. The National Nosocomial Infections surveillance systems, Clinical Infect Disease 33 (2): 569-577.
  11. Melta M, Duhta P, GuptaV.(2007)Bacterial isolates from burns wound infection and their antibio gram : A eight-year study. Indian J. Plastic sung. 40 (1): 1-28.
  12. Anguzu, J.R, Ohila D.(2007) Drug sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates from septicpest-operative wounds in a regional referral hospital in Uganda. Afri. Health Scient. 7(3)
  13. Fadeyi A, Adigun I, Rahman G. (2008) Bacteriological pattern of wound isolates in patients with chronic leg ulcer. International Journal Health  Res.1(4): 183-188
  14. Sobayo ET, Osoba AO.(1984) Surgical wounds infection in University college Hospital Ibadan. Nigeria Quarterly J. Hospital Med. 2:9-14
  15. Sule A, Thanni L, Sule-odu, Olusanya O(2002) Baterial pathogens Associated with infected wounds in Ogun State University Teaching Hospital Sagamu Nigeria. Afri J. Clin. Exp. Microbiology 3(1) : 13-16.
  16. Vega D, Tellado JM,(1999) Evidence-based medicine in antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis    Enferm. Infect. Microbiol. Clin; 17: .
  17. Hart C, Kariuki S.(1998) Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries resistance in developing countries . British Medical Journal; 317: 647-650
  18. Kernebradikumo Pondei, Beleudanyo G, Fente, Oluwatoyosi Oladapo(2012) Current microbial isolates from wound swabs, their culture and sensitivity patterns at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Nigeria (2012) Kesah et al.
  19. Bowler P, Duerden I, Armstrong D (2001) Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clinical Microbiot Review14(2): 22-269
  20. Collee, J.G.;R.S. Miles, B. Watt Testes for the identification of bacteria J.G. Collee (Ed.), Mackie and McCartney(1996)Practical Medical Microbiology, Churchill Livingstone, New York, USA
  21.  Cheesbrough M (2004) Distric laboratory practice in tropical countries Part 2. Cambridge University Press. Pp 357
  22. Bauer, A.W; W.M.M. Kirby, J.C. Sherris, M. Turch (1966)Antibioticsusceptibility testing by standardized single disk method Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 45: 493
  23. Koneman, E.; Stephen Allen (2008). Diagnostico Microbiologico/ Microbiological diagnosis: Texto Y Atlas En Color/ Text and Color Atlas (Spanish Edition)  Spanish
  24. Mohammedaman Mama, Alemseged Abdissa and Tsegaye Sewunet (2014)Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West EthiopiaAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 13:14 1186/1476-0711-13-14
  25. Gelaw A(2001)Isolation of bacterial pathogens from patients with postoperative surgical site infections and possible sources of infections at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.
  26. Biadglegne F, Abera B, Alem A, Anagaw B(2009): Bacterial isolates from wound infection and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, North West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci.19(3):173-178.
  27. Ohalete CN, Obi RK, EmeaKoroha MC(2012)Bacteriology of different wound infection and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Imo state Nigeria. World J Pharm Pharm Sci.1(3):1155-1172.
  28. Amoran OE, Sogebi AO, Fatugase OM: Rates and risk factors associated with surgical site infections in a tertiary care center in South-Western Nigeria.
  29. Bhatt C, Lakhey M(2006): The distribution of pathogens causing wound infection and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern. J Nepal Health Res Council5(1):22-26.
  30. Mulu A, Moges F, Tessema B, Kassu A (2006): Patterns and multiple drug resistance of bacterial pathogens at university of Gondar teaching hospital. Northwest Ethiopia Ethiop Med J, 44(2):125-131.
  31. Mulu W, Kibru G, Beyene G, Damtie M(2012): Postoperative nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacteria isolates among patients admitted at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahirdar. Ethiopia Ethiop J Health Sci.22(1):7-18.
  32. Emele F, Izomoh M, Alufohai E(1999): Microorganisms Associated With Wound Infection In Ekpoma. Nigeria.  West Afr J Med, 18(2):97-100.
  33. Siergrist H, Nepa MC, Jacquet (1999) Susceptibility to Levofloxacin of clinical isolates of bacrteria from intensive care and haematologival/oncology patients in Switzerland: a multicenter study J. Antimicrobchemother4:51-4
  34. Nutambala N, Hiran R. Aipesh Puri P(2011) Antibiotic Sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in posy operative wound infections. J phamacol pharmacother 2(3): 158-164

Article Tools
  Abstract
  PDF(449K)
Follow on us
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931