American Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 3, Issue 6-1, November 2015, Pages: 1-4

Outcome of Paraquat Self-poisoning a Case series

M Indira1, Rakesh T P1, Hithesh Shankar T S2, Suchithra E T3, Andrews M A1

1Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India

2Department of Forensic medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India

3Department of Community medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India

Email address:

(M Indira)

To cite this article:

M Indira, Rakesh T P, Hithesh Shankar T S, Suchithra E T, Andrews M A. Outcome of Paraquat Self-poisoning a Case series. American Journal of Internal Medicine. Special Issue: Toxicology. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajim.s.2015030601.11


Abstract: Introduction –Paraquat is available as 20% solution for agricultural purposes and deliberate ingestion can be lethal despite newer modalities of management.Methods - We present a case series from a tertiary care hospital, consisting of six patients admitted from January 2012 to December 2013 with history of paraquat ingestion. All of them weretreated with supportive and specific care in the form of charcoal hemoperfusion (HP) and immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide and steroids and outcome was evaluated.Results - All patients developed respiratory, renal and hepatic dysfunction. Three patients died within one week of paraquat ingestion, two patients at the end of second week and one patient lost follow-up after discharge. Autopsy showed ARDS in three of them.Conclusion -Paraquat is highly toxic. Ingestion of concentrated form most likely results in non responsiveness to available modalities of treatment.

Keywords: Paraquat, Charcol hemoperfusion, Immunosuppressive therapy, ARDS, Renal and hepatic dysfunction


1. Introduction

Paraquat is a commonly used weedicide in Asia.1 It is a dipyridyl compound and a relatively safe agent as far as occupational exposure is concerned.But it is highly toxic when used for deliberate self harm and hence a major cause of pesticide death in developed and developing countries.2 Commercially produced 10-30% of concentrated forms are diluted and used for agricultural purposes. In weeds, it causes destruction of tissues on contact by inhibiting conversion of NADP to NADPH during photosynthesis.3 The latter causes formation of oxygen free radicals which destroy the lipid membrane of cell organelles leading to cell death.

Once ingested, paraquat is rapidly absorbed from gut, causing high blood levels from where tissue distribution and accumulation occurs,4affecting mainly lungs, kidneys and liver. Absorption from stomach is incomplete; only 30% is absorbed and the remaining passes to intestine from where further continuous absorption can occur. 90% of absorbed poison is rapidly excreted through kidneys and which accumulated in viscera are excreted over days.5Once tissue accumulation occurs, progressive tissue damage is likely.6Paraquat can cause acute and late symptoms, both predominantly involving the respiratory system. In self poisoning where significant amount is ingested, symptoms develop within hours to few days. Lung is the primary organ affected where it is maximally concentrated, followed by liver and kidney.It affects both type I and type II pneumatocytes and death usually occurs due to ARDS. As it acts with oxygen molecules, resulting superoxide radicals can further destroy the lung tissue. In occupational exposure where minimal quantity is absorbed or deliberate poisoning where small quantity is ingested, symptoms are late to develop.

Acute tubular necrosis and fulminant hepatic failure are the other complications which augment the mortality.7 Direct cardiac toxicity and cardiogenic shock is also described. Multiorgan dysfunction commonly occurs causing death next to ARDS.

Though there are many treatment modalities recommended for paraquat exposure,8 the outcomeremains poor.

2. Methods

We present a case series of six patients, consecutively admitted in medical wards with paraquat poisoning in a tertiary care hospital over a period of two years from January 2012 to December 2013. The diagnosis of paraquat ingestion was obtained from history, reference letters and the bottle produced. Treatment histories from other hospitals were obtained from reference letter.

In emergency department, patients were stabilized by securing airway, breathing and circulation. Oxygen supplementation was avoided as far as possible unless saturation fell below 70%. 2 Activated charcoal was introduced through ryles tube to all patients and Fuller’s earth whenever available.9 To remove absorbed poison from blood stream, charcoal hemoperfusion was given as early as possible and there after 24 hours. Immunosuppressive therapy in the form of  1gm cyclophosphamide for two days, 1gm methyl prednesolone for 3 days followed by  20 mg dexamethasone till recovery was given to modify tissue response.10 Patients were monitored for development of respiratory distress as evidenced by tachypnoea or fall in oxygen saturation to below 90% and renal dysfunction as per KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury.11Hepatic dysfunction was taken as more than double fold rise in transaminases. All patients received supportive measures including hemodialysis whenever necessary. Patients were followed up till recovery or death.

3. Case Series

The characteristics of patientsare summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Patient characterestics

Sl no. Age / sex Time to receive initial care Time to receive specific care Treatment received Complications Survival period Autopsy findings
1 48/M 1 h 3.30 hours FE*, CH**, IS¶ Multiorgan dysfunction at the time of presentation 1 day Congested organs
2 26/M 30 min 6.40 hours FE, CH, IS Respiratory dysfunction on 7th hour of consumption, hepatitis and renal dysfunction on 2nd day 7 days ARDS
3 40/F 3 d 4 days FE, CH, IS Respiratory, renal and hepatic dysfunction at the time of presentation 16 days Congested organs
4 35/M 1 h 1 hour FE, CH, IS Hepatitis on 2nd day, renal and respiratory dysfunction on 3rd day 2 days ARDS
5 31/M 3 h 10 hours FE, CH, IS Hepatitis and renal dysfunction on 2nd day, respiratory distress on 4th day 13 days ARDS
6 54/F 3.15 h 3.15 hours FE, CH, IS Hepatitis on 2nd day, renal and respiratory dysfunction on 3rd day of consumption Discharged against medical advice NA

*Fuller’s earth, **Charcol hemoperfusion, Immunosuppressive therapy

Age of patients ranged from 26 to 54; four men and two women. Except one, all of them were refered from primary centers where they received initial symptomatic treatment. The exact amount of poison ingested could not be assessed and all gave history of taking at least one mouthful. Specific treatment was given in our institution, consisting of fuller’s earth, charcoal hemoperfusion, steroid and cyclophosphamide.Notably, in spite of treatment, all developed renal, hepatic and respiratory dysfunction.

Soon after ingestion, all developed vomiting and burning sensation in mouth. Case 3 consumed one mouthful of poison and vomited immediately. She disclosed the history only on 3rd day when she developed breathlessness and at the time of admission, had renal, hepatic and respiratory dysfunction. Case 5 also gave history of vomiting soon after poison ingestion.Five of the patients expired and one patient was discharged against medical advice after developing respiratory distress. Survival period ranged from 24 hours to 16 days.

4. Discussion

As paraquat is highly toxic and by intuition, preventing absorption remains the only method to reduce toxicity and improving outcome.212 Ingestion of more than 40 mg of paraquat ion/kg body weight can lead to multiorgan failure with acute renal failure, hepatic necrosis, myocardial necrosis, acute pneumonitis, internal haemorrhages, pulmonary fibrosis and finally death.13 Ingestion of less than 20-40 mg/Kg causes slow toxicity with development of oral, esophageal and gastric erosions in the first 24 hours, hepatocellular and acute kidney injury in the next 24 to 72 hours and pulmonary fibrosis in 72 to 96 hours.14 Depending upon the amount, development of symptoms may be delayed for days to weeks.

All the patients in our series had multi organ dysfunction despite receiving specific care within four hours in three of them. Paraquat toxicity depends on the blood level.7 Initial absorption occurs from stomach and intestine in first six hours- primary organ accumulated being lungs at this stage- prolonging upto18 hours.9 Studies on animal models have shown that constant blood level is seen upto 30hrs, suggesting continuous absorption from intestine. Hence measures to prevent absorption from gut and removal from blood by extracorporeal elimination remain the methods for reducing toxicity, unlikely benefiting those with high amount of ingestion due to early extensive tissue damage. In our series, five patients received initial care within four hours (among which two received within one hour) but developed multiorgan dysfunction.

Adsorbents like activated charcol, bentonite and fuller's earth might have a role in preventing further absorption from stomach and intestine especially given within six hours of ingestion. Strongest adsorbent capacity is for fuller's earth, hence preferred, but others are also useful if this is not available.

Unlike hemodialysis, extracorporeal elimination with hemoperfusion effectively removes poison from blood if given within first six hours of poison ingestion,1516especiallyin the initial hours as evidenced by lesser blood levels in survivors. Single hemoperfusion can cause 99% reduction of the poison level in blood.17 Hemodialysis is considered as renal replacement therapy ifacute tubular necrosis occurs. However, in our series, three patients who received hemoperfusion within four hours also had poor outcome, probably due to larger amount of ingested poison. Hsu et al analysed 207 patients with severe paraquat poisoning treated with charcoal hemoperfusion and observed that those received HP within 4 hours post ingestion had significantly reduced mortality.18

Immunosuppressive therapies are found to be of questionable beneficial in few trials, especially in moderate to severe poisoning. Lin et al published a RCT in 1996 showing survival benefit in patients treated with steroid and cyclophosphamide when given as pulse dose for one or two days rather than high dose for 14 days. 19 However, their role in fulminant cases is minimal as per previous studies. Later the same author published another RCT in 2006 showing the benefit of repeated pulses of cyclophosphamide whenever oxygen saturation falls below 60%.20 At the same time Perriens et al in another RCT showed no difference in survival benefit in those received supportive therapy or immunosuppressants.21

Severity of poisoning is graded as mild, moderate to severe and fulminant retrospectively, usually reflecting the amount of poison ingested. In fulminant cases, death occurs in first week, aggressive therapies becoming futile. Here we had three patients with fulminant course and two with moderate to severe poisoning. Paraquat is available as 20% solution and an amount less than 5ml causes mild,of 5 to 15ml (half to 1.5 teaspoon) is sufficient to produce moderate to severe while more than 15ml is expected to produce fulminant poisoning.2223

Studies have shown that plasma paraquat levels can be used for assessing prognosis and accordingly various nomograms have been devised. Poor outcome is seen in patients with blood level of more than 5gm/L at any time. Proudfoot et al measured plasma paraquat level in 79 patients and correlated with outcome. Patients whose plasma concentrations do not exceed 2·0, 0·6, 0·3, 0·16, and 0·1 mg/l at 4, 6, 10, 16, and 24 h respectively are likely to have good outcome.24 Alternatively, calorimetric urine paraquat estimation (urine benzathionine test) also helps in prognostication. Urine colour change to dark or navy-blue has poor prognosis while light blue has got good prognosis.252627 Liu et al observed 11 patients with paraquat poisoning and found out that plasma and urine paraquat levels were significantly low in survivors than non-survivors.28 Urine test can also be used for predicting fulminant cases before starting immunosuppressive therapy.

Occupational exposure of paraquet runs a milder course as paraquat is used indiluent form for agriculture purposes. A study on Srilankan workers have shown that despite evidence of dermal exposure of paraquat used for spraying, it was not detected in urine samples.29 Hence the production of paraquat in highly concentrated form may be discouraged.

5. Conclusion

Paraquat self poisoning carries extremely bad outcome in spite of early medical care- ingestion of even small quantities of concentrarted paraquat (20%) can have severe to fulminant clinical course. Cause of death in acute toxicity remains hepatorenal dysfunction and ARDS.


References

  1. Dawson AH, Eddleston M, Senarathna L, Mohamed F, Gawarammana I, Bowe SJ, et al. Acute human lethal toxicity of agricultural pesticides: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010 Oct;7(10):e1000357.
  2. Gawarammana IB, Buckley NA. Medical management of paraquat ingestion. Br J ClinPharmacol. 2011 Nov ;72(5):745–57.
  3. Peng J, Stevenson FF, Oo ML, Andersen JK. Iron-enhanced paraquat-mediated dopaminergic cell death due to increased oxidative stress as a consequence of microglial activation. Free RadicBiolMed . 2009 Jan 15;46(2):312–20.
  4. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, Two-Volume Set: Principles and Agents, Volume 1. Academic Press; 2001 [cited 2015 Jan 7]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?id=PzMWogFy_wgC&pgis=1
  5. Houzé P, Baud FJ, Mouy R, Bismuth C, Bourdon R, Scherrmann JM. Toxicokinetics of paraquat in humans. Hum ExpToxicol. 1990 Jan ;9(1):5–12.
  6. Gaudreault P, Karl PI, Friedman PA. Paraquat and putrescine uptake by lung slices of fetal and newborn rats. Drug MetabDispos. 2014 ;12(5):550–2.
  7. Senarathna L, Eddleston M, Wilks MF, Woollen BH, Tomenson JA, Roberts DM, et al. Prediction of outcome after paraquat poisoning by measurement of the plasma paraquat concentration. QJM .2009 ;102(4):251–9.
  8. Eddleston M, Wilks MF, Buckley NA. Prospects for treatment of paraquat-induced lung fibrosis with immunosuppressive drugs and the need for better prediction of outcome: a systematic review. QJM . 2003;96(11):809–24.
  9. Meredith TJ, Vale JA. Treatment of paraquat poisoning in man: methods to prevent absorption. Hum Toxicol. 1987 Jan ;6(1):49–55.
  10. Lin JL, Leu ML, Liu YC, Chen GH. A prospective clinical trial of pulse therapy with glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide in moderate to severe paraquat-poisoned patients. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 1999 Feb;159(2):357–60.
  11. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. [cited 2015 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.kdigo.org/clinical_practice_guidelines/pdf/KDIGO AKI Guideline.pdf
  12. Dargan PI, Shiew CM, Greene SL, Gawarammana IB J AL. Paraquat Poisoning: Caution in Interpreting Prognosis Based on Plasma Paraquat Concentrations. ClinToxicol. 2006;44:762.
  13. FábioFernandesNeves, RomualdoBarroso Sousa AP-F, Palmira Cupo, Jorge Elias Júnior MHN-B. Severe paraquat poisoning: clinical and radiological findings in a survivor. J Bras Pneumol.2010;36(4):513–6.
  14. Vale JA, Meredith TJ, Buckley BM. Paraquat poisoning: clinical features and immediate general management. Hum Toxicol. 1987 Jan ;6(1):41–7.
  15. Kang M-S, Gil H-W, Yang J-O, Lee E-Y, Hong S-Y. Comparison between kidney and hemoperfusion for paraquat elimination. J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Jan ;24 Suppl:S156–60.
  16. Hong S, Yang J, Lee E, Kim S. Effect of haemoperfusion on plasma paraquat concentration in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Ind. 2003; Available from: http://tih.sagepub.com/content/19/1/17.short
  17. Tabei K, Asano Y, Hosoda S. Efficacy of charcoal hemoperfusion in paraquat poisoning. Artif Organs. 1982 Feb;6(1):37–42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7073521
  18. Hsu C-W, Lin J-L, Lin-Tan D-T, Chen K-H, Yen T-H, Wu M-S, et al. Early hemoperfusion may improve survival of severely paraquat-poisoned patients. Chang AYW, editor. PLoSOne . Public Library of Science; 2012 Jan ;7(10):e48397.
  19. Lin JL, Wei MC, Liu YC. Pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone in patients with moderate to severe paraquat poisoning: a preliminary report. Thorax . 1996 Jul;51(7):661–3.
  20. Lin J-L, Lin-Tan D-T, Chen K-H, Huang W-H. Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severe paraquat poisoning. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):368–73.
  21. Perriëns JH, Benimadho S, Kiauw IL, Wisse J, Chee H. High-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in paraquatpoisoning: a prospective study. Hum ExpToxicol. 1992 Mar;11(2):129–34.
  22. Wilks MF, Fernando R, Ariyananda PL, Eddleston M, Berry DJ, Tomenson JA, et al. Improvement in survival after paraquat ingestion following introduction of a new formulation in Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2008 Feb ;5(2):e49.
  23. Wilks MF, Tomenson JA, Fernando R, Ariyananda PL, Berry DJ, Buckley NA, et al. Formulation changes and time trends in outcome following paraquat ingestion in Sri Lanka. ClinToxicol (Phila). 2011 Jan ;49(1):21–8.
  24. Proudfoot AT, Stewart MS, Levitt T, Widdop B. Paraquat poisoning: significance of plasma-paraquat concentrations. Lancet . 1979 Aug 18 ;2(8138):330–2.
  25. Jones AL, Elton R, Flanagan R. Multiple logistic regression analysis of plasma paraquat concentrations as a predictor of outcome in 375 cases of paraquat poisoning. QJM . 1999 Oct;92(10):573–8.
  26. Koo J-R, Yoon J-W, Han S-J, Choi M-J, Park I-I, Lee Y-K, et al. Rapid analysis of plasma paraquat using sodium dithionite as a predictor of outcome in acute paraquat poisoning. Am J Med Sci. 2009 Nov;338(5):373–7.
  27. Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A, Remião F, Bastos ML, Carvalho F. Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008 Jan ;38(1):13–71.
  28. Liu P, He Y, Wang H, Li G, Zhang C, Zhang X, et al. [Study on the prognosis of patients with acute paraquat intoxication]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing ZaZhi. 2011 Mar;29(3):212–5.
  29. Chester G, Gurunathan G, Jones N, Woollen BH. Occupational exposure of Sri Lankan tea plantation workers to paraquat. Bull World Health Organ. 1993 Jan;71(5):625–32

Article Tools
  Abstract
  PDF(169K)
Follow on us
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931