Journal of Surgery
Volume 5, Issue 3-1, May 2017, Pages: 43-48

Modified Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy in a Benign Unilateral Thyroid Swelling

Mohamed A. Mlees*, Ahmed A. Darwish

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Email address:

(M. A. Mlees)

*Corresponding author

To cite this article:

Mohamed A. Mlees, Ahmed A. Darwish. Modified Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy in a Benign Unilateral Thyroid Swelling. Journal of Surgery. Special Issue: Minimally Invasive and Minimally Access Surgery. Vol. 5, No. 3-1, 2017, pp. 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.19

Received: February 8, 2017; Accepted: February 9, 2017; Published: February 28, 2017

Abstract: Background and aim: Conventional thyroidectomy may cause a long neck scar and a variety of potential complications. The concept of minimally invasive surgery has recently found many supporters in the management of thyroid disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suprasternal approach of modified minimal invasive video-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy (MIVAET) in treatment of unilateral simple nodular goiter in term of: feasibility of the operation, the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) and parathyroid glands, operative time, postoperative pain and cosmetic result.. Patients and methods: This study was conducted on 20 patients with a simple solitary thyroid nodule in Surgical Oncology Unit at General Surgery Department, Tanta University Hospital from March 2015 to June 2016. Patients included in the study had small nodule less than 5 cm in maximum diameter, unilateral lesion, no previous neck surgery, benign lesion and euthyroid state. Every patient was subjected to MIVAET through a Suprasternal 2-cm neck incision. Results: The present study comprised 18 females (90%) and 2 males (10%) patients with a mean age of 32 years, The mean operative time was 63 minutes, simple nodular goiter was the commonest pathological finding, 90% of the patients stayed in the hospital one day and 70% were satisfied from cosmetic appearance of their scar 6 months after the operation. Conclusion: Modified minimal invasive video-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy was feasible, can be done safely and effectively with a better aesthetic outcome and pathological control without increasing the risk of complications.

Keywords: Endoscopic Thyroidectomy, Video-Assisted, Minimal Invasive, Thyroid Nodule

1. Introduction

Thyroidectomy is one of the most common operations performed throughout the world and it has a low morbidity if performed by a skilled surgical team [1]. The conventional thyroidectomy normally requires a long collar incision, usually 6-10 cm in length, wide skin flaps and a long midline opening of the strap muscles to provide exposure of the thyroid gland, regardless of the extent of thyroidectomy planned. This conventional approach may cause a long neck scar and a variety of complications [2]. The thyroid gland is frequently affected by benign or low-grade malignant diseases and the majority of patients are young women who consider the aesthetic appearance to be very important. For this reason many surgeons have been prompted to try a minimally invasive approach to thyroid gland [3].

In neck surgery; Gagner in 1996 [4] described the 1st endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy using constant gas insufflation for hyperparathyroidism obtaining good clinical and cosmetic results. Subsequently, alternative techniques were devised to further improve the results of endoscopic surgery for neck lesions [5]. The main and safest indication of MIVATs is still benign thyroid disease; however, a new indication includes "low-risk" malignancies such as well-differentiated papillary thyroid carcinomas (< 20mm in diameter) without presence or suspicion of metastatic lymph nodes. More recent study of patients with incidental thyroiditis and Graves disease have shown no increase overall morbidity for MIVAT verses conventional open surgery [6,7].

Several techniques for minimally invasive thyroidectomy have been described with the primary aim of obtaining better cosmetic results. These include minimally invasive total endoscopic approaches with constant gas insufflations [8], minimally invasive video-assisted gasless thyroidectomy (MIVAT) [9] and minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomies performed through a minimal incision with conventional retraction [10].

In addition, endoscopic approaches to the thyroid can be performed using direct or indirect approaches. The direct approaches place the access ports within the cervical region and are considered the least invasive [11]. On the other hand, indirect approaches include the anterior chest wall or axillary approach [5] and breast approach [12].

2. Patients and Methods

The present study was conducted on 20 patients with simple solitary thyroid nodule in Surgical Oncology Unit at General Surgery Department, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt, from March 2015 to June 2016. The patients included in the study aged ≥18 years old, had small nodule less than 5 cm in maximum diameter, Total thyroid volume <20 ml ultrasonographically determined, unilateral lesion, no enlarged lymph nodes in the neck, no previous neck surgery or irradiation, benign lesion and euthyroid state.

Every patient was subjected to: history taking with special emphasis on symptoms of hypo or hyperthyroidism, general and local thyroid examination and investigations that include: measurement of serum free T3, freeT4, and TSH, Complete blood picture, liver function tests, renal function tests, blood glucose level, neck ultrasonography, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and vocal cords mobility assessment by ENT specialist. The suspicious cases with atypical cells were immunostained for a panel of markers including Galactin -3, CD56, and HBME-1. Cases suspected to be malignant by immunohistochemistry were excluded from the study.

A written informed consent had been obtained from every patient included in the study after explanation of the nature of the procedure and possible complications. The study was approved by Tanta Faculty of Medicine ethical committee.

3. The Surgical Procedure

All patients were subjected to minimally invasive video-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy (MIVAET) through a suprasternal neck incision. To reduce the cost of the operation; we modified the original technique by using conventional rather than special surgical instrumentation and electrocautery rather than harmonic scalpel. The operation was performed under general anesthesia; the patient was placed in the supine position with no hyperextension of the neck as this makes it difficult to open surgical planes with retractors. Two assistants were required with the 1st assistant opposite the main surgeon and the 2nd assistant at the head of the patient.

The process of incision design involves the 3 steps described in figure 1. The midpoints of sternal notch, thyroid notch, and mental region were identified and marked respectively as points 1, 2, and 3. The midline of the neck was identified by stretching a 2-0 silk tie between points 1 and 2. Point 4 was marked 2-cm above point 1 in the midline, usually higher in women with large breasts. The distance between points 1 and 4 determines the height of the incision. A 2-0 silk tie running perpendicular to the midline was pressed against the neck through point 4. Points 5 and 6, equally distant from point 4, were marked symmetrically in the perpendicular line. The distance between points 5 and 6 was the planned incision length (1.5-2.5-cm). The skin incision was achieved by connecting points 5 and 6 along Langer’s lines.

Figure 1. An illustrative drawing showing the incision design for MIVAET[9].

The incision was made through the skin, subcutaneous fat and platysma which were carefully dissected to avoid any minimum bleeding. The skin flaps were raised by blunt and sharp dissection staying in the midline exposing the strap muscles superiorly and inferiorly for approximately 3-4-cm (Figure 2).

Figure 2. An operative photograph showing the skin incision.

As with conventional thyroidectomy, the midline relatively avascular plane was opened from superior to inferior for at least 3-4-cm. The strap muscles on the affected side were gently retracted with a small conventional retractor; another retractor was placed directly on the thyroid lobe which is retracted medially and lifted up. The dissection of the lobe from the strap muscles was completely carried out through the skin incision by gentle retraction using conventional instruments. The two small retractors maintain the operative space. A 30º 10-mm endoscope was inserted through the skin incision to provide good visualization. Dissection of the thyrotracheal groove was completed under endoscopic vision by using small conventional instruments. Washing and cleaning the operative field was very simple because there are no trocars in this procedure and sterile saline can be injected directly with the syringe.

Avoiding the electrocautery was particularly important when laryngeal nerves had not yet exposed. The 1st vessel to be ligated was the middle thyroid vein (if present) or the small veins between internal jugular vein (IJV) and thyroid capsule. Hemostasis was achieved by means of ligature or electrocautery. This step allows a better preparation of the thyrotracheal groove where the RLN will be later searched for.

Further thyroid gland mobilization was started by dissection of the the lateral aspect of the superior pedicle followed by opening of the potential space medially between the superior thyroid pedicle and the cricothyroid muscle. The superior pedicle was ligated and divided. The inferior vessels were similarly divided, exposing the anterolateral side of the trachea (Figures 3 & 4).

Figure 3. An operative photograph showing the opening of potential space between superior thyroid lobe and cricothyroid muscle (arrow).

Figure 4. An operative photograph showing the superior thyroid pedicle before division (arrow).

The RLN generally lies in the thyrotracheal groove behind the Zuckerkandl tuberculum (posterior lobe) which was an important landmark in this step. Its vascular supply was preserved by selective ligature of the branches of the inferior thyroid artery (ITA). During dissection; hemostasis was achieved by ligature when dealing with large or small vessels close to the nerve. The RLN was dissected and freed from the thyroid gland (Figure 5).

Figure 5. An operative photograph showing identification of the Right RLN (arrow).

After removing the endoscope and the retractors, the upper portion of the gland carefully was pulled out using conventional forces. Gentle traction over the lobe allows the complete exteriorization of the gland. Large thyroid cyst also was a good indication for this procedure if it was aspirated before pulling out the thyroid lobe from the skin incision. The isthmus was then dissected from the trachea and divided using electrocautery or transfixion ligation. After completely exposing the trachea, the lobe was finally removed (Figure 6).

Figure 6. An operative photograph showing extraction of the RT lobe of the thyroid gland.

The deep fascia and platysma were sutured with absorbable suture and the wound was closed with 3-0 polypropylene or vicryl subcuticular suture, the removed specimen was sent for histopathological examination (Figure 7).

Figure 7. An operative photograph showing wound closure.

4. Post-Operative Care and Follow Up

In the first 24 hours, the patients were observed for vital signs, wound hematoma, dyspnea or voice changes. The patients started oral fluid after recovery and regular diet 6 hours after the operation. Measurement of post-operative pain was carried out by visual analogue scale (VAS), which consists of a 10-cm line with the words no pain on the left side and worst pain imaginable on the right side. Every patients were asked to evaluate their pain 6 and 24 hours after operation by indicating its level on the line. Pain severity was defined. Patients with scores of 3 or less were defined as having mild pain, those from 3.1 to 6.9 moderate pain and those with score 7 or more were considered to have severe pain (Figure 8). Mild to moderate pain needed a small dose of oral or injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and the dose of analgesia increased with severity of pain, while sever pain may required opioid analgesia [13].

Figure 8. The visual analogue scale (VAS) [13].

The patients were discharged on the next day of the operation. Follow-up visits were conducted for every patient; the first visit at one week where the patients were followed up for wound seroma or infection then every month for 6 months. In the next visits, the patients were followed up for satisfaction about wound scar through verbal response scale (V R S) [14] which had 4 options: 1= poor, 2 = accepted, 3 = good and 4 = excellent (Figure 9).

Figure 9. A postoperative photograph showing the scar six months postoperative (arrow).

5. Results

The present study comprised 18 female (90%) and 2 male (10%) patients. The patients' age ranged from 18 to 60 years with a mean age of 32.17 ± 12.27 years. The largest diameter of the thyroid nodule with ultrasound measure ranged from 15 to 40 mm with a mean diameter of 28±6.83 mm (Table1).

Table 1. The largest diameter of the thyroid nodule, according to ultrasound finding.

The largest diameter of the thyroid nodule in mm Number %
15-20 4 20
21-25 4 20
26-30 6 30
31-35 2 10
36-40 4 20
Total 20 100

In the present study; the preoperative pathology of the thyroid nodule (by FNAC) was: simple nodular goiter in 10 patients (50%), benign follicular lesion in 8 patients (40%) and hurthel cell neoplasm in 2 patients (10%). The operative time was 60 minutes in 18 patients (90%) and ranged from 60 to 90 minutes in 2 patients (10%) that proved to had thyroiditis in postoperative pathology, with a mean time of 63 ± 9.84 minutes. The postoperative pathology of the thyroid nodule was: benign goiter in 8 patients (40%), follicular adenoma in 8 patients (40%), hurthel cell adenoma in 2 patients (10%) and thyroiditis in 2 patients (10%).

As regard postoperative pain, we found that; most of the patients (70%) had moderate postoperative pain that required injection of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), 30% had mild pain that required oral NSAIDS. Ninety percent of the patients stayed in the hospital one day and 10% stayed 2 days with a mean of 1.1 ± 0.3 days. In this study 70% of the patients were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their scar 6 months after the operation, considered it excellent, 20% considered it good and 10% considered it accepted. No local wound complications were recorded and no mortality.

6. Discussion

Surgical trends have been directed toward less invasive procedures, especially since the establishment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1986. Since the first description of endoscopic parathyroidectomy by Gagner in 1996 [4], several procedures have been proposed for the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism and the thyroid nodule [5]. Minimally invasive surgery reduces surgical morbidity and consequently the social costs of hospital admission by reducing postoperative hospital stay [15].

In the current study; to reduce the cost of the operation; we modified the original technique by using conventional rather than special surgical instrumentation and electrocautery rather than harmonic scalpel. It is performed by a single horizontal 1.5 to 2.5 cm skin incision. Through this minicervicotomy, under endoscopic vision, it is possible to carry out an operation essentially identical to conventional thyroidectomy.

The present study was the first trial of endoscopic surgery of the thyroid in Tanta University Hospital, so we started with a unilateral simple nodule. The patients offered the advantages of endoscopic surgery without extra cost. The selection criteria adopted in this study was coincided with the same eligibility criteria of Yamashita et al [16] and Michela et al [17] which include: Thyroid nodule of 35 mm or less in largest diameter, the estimated thyroid volume was in the normal range (less than 20 ml). Patients with previous neck surgery, radiation therapy, presence of enlarged lymph nodes, or thyroiditis were excluded from their study. While Bellantone et al [15] had widened the selection criteria; Patients who had undergone video-assisted thyroid lobectomy were selected for video-assisted completion thyroidectomy in cases of malignancy at final histology. Also, selected nodules with maximum longitudinal axis up to 45mm, with a transverse diameter of 15 to 20 mm, were considered eligible for VAT.

In the present study; the mean patients age was 32.17 ± 12.27 years (range = 18- 60 years), and this is agree with Miccoli et al [9] who reported in their study that; the mean age of the patients was 39.8 ± 12.5 years (range: 15- 65 years). In the present study; the mean of largest diameter in our study was 28 ± 6.83 mm (rang: 15-40 mm). This agrees with Miccoli et al [18] who reported in their study that; the mean of largest diameter of the nodules was 31 ± 8 mm (range: 5-48 mm). While Yeh et al [19] reported in their study that; the mean of largest diameter was 58mm (range: 35- 80 mm).

In this study; the mean operative time was 63 ± 9.84 minutes (range: 60 - 90 minutes), this is comparable with Miccoli et al [9] who found that; the mean operative time was 82.0 minutes (range: 60-120 minutes and Bellantone et al [15] who found that; the mean operative time was 86.8 ± 26.4 minutes (range: 30-150 minutes). While in the study of Michela et al [17], the mean operating time was 109 min (range: 80-241 min).

In the current study; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.1 ± 0.3 days (range: 1 - 2 days), and this is comparable with Mourad et al [20] who found that; the postoperative hospital stay was 24 hours for 66.7% of the patients and the rest of the patients stayed 48 hours. Also Bellantone et al [15] found that; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.5 days (range =1- 5 days). Miccoli et al [18] found that; the postoperative hospital stay was 24 hours (overnight discharge) for most of their patients (96%). In case of symptomatic hypocalcaemia or fever, patients remained one day more.

In this study; the cosmetic results of the operative scar were considered excellent in the majority of the patients (70%), considered good in 20% of the patients, while it considered accepted in 10% of the patients. This agree with Gal et al [21], Rio [22] and El Labban [23] who found that; the majority of the patients had more satisfactory cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress. Also Hegazy et al [24] demonstrated in their study that; MIVAT offers a significant better postoperative course and smaller incisions with good cosmetic outcome. Also Mourad et al [20] found in their study that; the aesthetic evaluation, carried out after a median postoperative follow-up of 8 months (range, 5 to 9 month) showed that; 93% of the patients were fully satisfied. One patient had hypertrophic scar that was managed with a local steroid infiltration.

7. Conclusion

Modified video-assisted thyroidectomy can be done safely and effectively with a better identification of all anatomical structures, good pathological control, less postoperative pain, the patients offered the advantages of endoscopic surgery with better aesthetic outcome, cost comparable to the conventional surgery without increasing the risk of complications.


  1. Mandolis S, Takashima M, Kirby M: Thyroid surgery, a comparison of outcomes between experts and surgeons in training. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 125: 30-33.
  2. Park CS, Chung WY, Chang HS: Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy. Surg Today 2001; 31(8): 665-669.
  3. Cavicchi O, Piccin O, Ceroni AR, Caliceti U: Minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2006); 135(5): 744-747.
  4. Gagner M: Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 1996; 83:875.
  5. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Tajima G, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Kurihara H: Total endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillary or anterior chest approach. Biomed Pharmacother 2002; 56: 72–78.
  6. Minuto M, Berti P, Miccoli M, Ugolini C, Matteuci V, Moretti M: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: an analysis of results and a revision of indications. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26: 818–822.
  7. Alesina PF, Singaporewalla RM, Eckstein A, Lahner H, Walz MK: Is minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy feasible in Graves' disease? Surgery. 2011; 149: 556-560.
  8. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y: Endoscopic neck surgery by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg (2000); 191: 336-340.
  9. Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multi-institutional experience. World J Surg 2002; 26: 972-975.
  10. Ferzli FS, Sayad P, Abdo ZCacchione RN: Minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroid surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(5): 665-668.
  11. Inabnet WB, Chu CA: Transcervical endoscopic-assisted mediastinal parathyroidectomy with intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1678.
  12. Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y, Ohmori T, Noga K, Furukawa T:Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 1-4.
  13. Portenoy RK & Tanner RM: Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Pain Intensity Scale: From Pain. Management: Theory and Practice.1996; by Oxford University Press, Inc. Used by permission of Oxford University Press.
  14. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P,De Crea C, Bellantone R: Video-assisted thyroidectomy: report on the experience of a single center in more than four hundred cases. World J Surg 2006; 30: 794-800.
  15. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Traini E: Videoassisted thyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194:610–614.
  16. Yamashita H, Watanabe S, Koike E, Ohshima A, Uchino S, Kuroki S: Videoassistedthyroid lobectomy through a small wound in the submandibular area. Am J Surg 2002; 183:286–289.
  17. Michela GC, Carlo B, Marco L, Luca A: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: Ascending the learning curve. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery 2015; 11: 119-122.
  18. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 243-248.
  19. Yeh TS, Jan YY, Hsu BR, Chen KW, Chen MF: Video-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy. Am J Surg 2000; 180:82–85.
  20. Mourad M, Saab N, Malaise J, Ngongang C, Fournier B, Daumerie C: Minimally invasive video-assisted approach for partial and total thyroidectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:1108–1111.
  21. Gal I, Solymosi T, Szabo Z, Balint A, Bolgar G: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:2445–2449.
  22. Rio PD: Mini Invasive Video Assisted Techniques in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. J Surg Transplant Sci 2013; 1: 1001.
  23. El-Labban GM: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Minim Access Surg 2009; 5:97–102.
  24. Hegazy MA, Khater AA, Setit AE:Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules. World J Surg 2007; 31:1743–1750.

Article Tools
Follow on us
Science Publishing Group
NEW YORK, NY 10018
Tel: (001)347-688-8931